Pompal 09.
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2011
- Messages
- 43,916
- Reaction score
- 52
- Points
- 48
This was in todays Star
Judge loosens body rub parlour rules
Nudity, sex act bans struck down
Brampton bylaw oversteps bounds
PETER SMALL
STAFF REPORTER
A judge has struck down sections of a Brampton bylaw prohibiting nudity and sex acts in body rub parlours.
Mr. Justice Emile Kruzick quashed a rule forcing female staff to cover their breasts and workers of both sexes to cover their pubic areas in the city's 16 parlours, because "it legislates morality and criminal law," which is beyond the city's powers.
He overturned an amendment barring sexual contact between parlour workers and clients because, he said, that is also the job of Canada's Criminal Code, not local bylaws.
The Ontario Superior Court judge also annulled, in his ruling released yesterday, a regulation limiting the hours of operation from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. because it is "unfairly discriminatory" as compared with the hours allowed "for other adult entertainment establishments."
The city amended its bylaw governing "non-therapeutic massage operations" to include the new rules in May, 2003.
Owners of the city's 16 body rub parlours, including Paradise Health Spa, Tokyo City Inc. and Holistic Therapy Clinic, challenged the amendments in court last October.
The city also sought, through its amendments, to limit the transfer of licences to a maximum of eight parlours. The judge threw this out on the basis that it is discriminatory in removing one of the rights of ownership, namely to sell a business that was legal and licensed under the previous rules. But he upheld the city's right to try to eventually get the number down to eight. The lawyer for the parlours did not return a call.
Janice Atwood-Petkovski, of Brampton's legal department, said yesterday the city will not appeal. City lawyers told the judge that activities in the parlours raised concerns about health and safety. Investigators found "a consistent pattern of activity involving sexual services," Kruzick noted.
Parlour owners argued that the city was legislating morality, which is Ottawa's job.
The judge agreed. "I find the city is attempting to legislate and expand on the existing provision of the Criminal Code because it wishes to control sexual activities in body rub parlours which, under the existing provisions, are difficult to enforce."
A Peel Region police detective gave evidence that he considered every body rub parlour to be a "common bawdy house," the judge said.
Judge loosens body rub parlour rules
Nudity, sex act bans struck down
Brampton bylaw oversteps bounds
PETER SMALL
STAFF REPORTER
A judge has struck down sections of a Brampton bylaw prohibiting nudity and sex acts in body rub parlours.
Mr. Justice Emile Kruzick quashed a rule forcing female staff to cover their breasts and workers of both sexes to cover their pubic areas in the city's 16 parlours, because "it legislates morality and criminal law," which is beyond the city's powers.
He overturned an amendment barring sexual contact between parlour workers and clients because, he said, that is also the job of Canada's Criminal Code, not local bylaws.
The Ontario Superior Court judge also annulled, in his ruling released yesterday, a regulation limiting the hours of operation from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. because it is "unfairly discriminatory" as compared with the hours allowed "for other adult entertainment establishments."
The city amended its bylaw governing "non-therapeutic massage operations" to include the new rules in May, 2003.
Owners of the city's 16 body rub parlours, including Paradise Health Spa, Tokyo City Inc. and Holistic Therapy Clinic, challenged the amendments in court last October.
The city also sought, through its amendments, to limit the transfer of licences to a maximum of eight parlours. The judge threw this out on the basis that it is discriminatory in removing one of the rights of ownership, namely to sell a business that was legal and licensed under the previous rules. But he upheld the city's right to try to eventually get the number down to eight. The lawyer for the parlours did not return a call.
Janice Atwood-Petkovski, of Brampton's legal department, said yesterday the city will not appeal. City lawyers told the judge that activities in the parlours raised concerns about health and safety. Investigators found "a consistent pattern of activity involving sexual services," Kruzick noted.
Parlour owners argued that the city was legislating morality, which is Ottawa's job.
The judge agreed. "I find the city is attempting to legislate and expand on the existing provision of the Criminal Code because it wishes to control sexual activities in body rub parlours which, under the existing provisions, are difficult to enforce."
A Peel Region police detective gave evidence that he considered every body rub parlour to be a "common bawdy house," the judge said.