Haylee @ Srm revisted.

[Susilo N]

Wanted to review my first time with her but Tlm took the honors.
So here is a mini review of my second visit to see her.

After my first great session with her i wanted to see Haylee right away again just to see if it was a one time experiance or if she is for real but my busy schedule kept me from seeing anyone for a good 7 day period.
Anyhow i managed to book her up without any problem as she is still fairly new and not that popular yet.Last time i went with a 30 mins session which turned out to be way too less and we went overtime . So this time i went with a 45 min. which i personelly prefer.

She is about 5.4'(About 5-10' with the heels she wear). Beautiful and innocent looking face ,NIce long blonde hair,All natural body with soft fair sized boobs and one of the nicest looking nipples.Softer stomach, nice butt and a good pair of legs.She does possess a very nice personality and and sports a very nice smile.

Her massage was better then last time(Still not much teasing ) but gave me an excellent head massage.The body slide was better then before too and the Nr part was the still the best just like the last time.And we wnet a lil bit over time once again.

Haylee is definately a keeper as she does have a very girly kind of innocent charm about her which is not very easy to find in this industry.She is not a drop dead gorgeous girl but definately is a beautiful addition to Srm' Roster.

Face: 9/10.

Personality:9/10. Very Charming

Body overall: 8/10

Massage: 8/10.

Reverse:9.5/10

Body slide:8.75/10

Finish: 9/10.

Repeat: Yes and very soon

 

[Patrick]

Sorry about beating you to the punch on the first review, MILUPA, but at least your revisit with Haylee was way better than mine. BTW, nice review !!!

I saw Haylee for the second time last week, and the experience was way less than memorable. No question that she has a charm and sweet personality, but she looked tired when I saw her. Probably it was because of the double shift. The massage barely lasted 5 minutes, after which she asked me to turn over. I was smart enough to give her a massage, otherwise the session would have been over in 15 minutes. No teasing whatsoever, and the BS was almost non-existent. I was disappointed in the end. I will give her another shot in the future, but if that session turns out to be like this one, I will stop seeing her.

 

[chris w]

TLm,

She was going for the kill with me too 15 mins into the session but i stopped her and asked for the Nr which just changed everything.

 

[tinyavenger]

These are things that I do not like to hear.

Two thumbs up for initial visit and mixed on repeat. Add in the fact that she was going for the kill early ... I know TLM books a 30 min session but M you had the 45 min session and she did the same.

I still have her on my TDL but I am going to downgrade her from a "Must See" to a "Hold Off" for a little while.

VBB

 

[Elaine M]

vbb check your pm

 

[Will in TN]

This is something I'm just not used to. With repeats, my sessions with any MPA usually get better, but this one took a turn for the worse. Just 5 minutes of actual massaging in a 30 minute session is unacceptable.

Since I also like to massage the MPA, I would expect at least 10 plus minutes of rubbing, then a a few minutes on my part, and going for the finish after 20 minutes or so.

I pay for 30 minutes and thats what I should get !!! If an MPA knows she will get very tired from working a double shift, then she should not do it. It affects customer service in the end.

 

[samAnThA]

Once again, inspired by all the [what appears to be legit] raving reviews I make my way into see Haylee...

The insinuations that she's more eye candy than anything else actually inspired me to see her - I'm not looking for a girlfriend, just some solid T&A and good fun from a pretty girl. And, that's what all the reviews/promotions seemed to lead up to.

Body: 6/10 at best. Reviews led me to believe she was tone but soft in the right areas. Sherry from Honey Girls fits that description, unfortunately Haylee is not tone, and just soft. Typical body of a young-mom. Not offensive, just not as promoted.

Face: 6.5/10 at best. Reviews led me to belive she had the face of an angel, at the same levels of say Holly from 490Yonge of way back. Not even close. I know everyone's got a type, but she's very average. Nothing at all wrong with that, unless of course you go in expecting to find your 9/10, as promoted.

FunFactor: 6.5/10 This is the part I don't understand. While most of the reviews/promotions suggest she's all good until you get to the party, I found her very interested in what I wanted and what she could do to make it fun (maybe she picked up on the fact I wasn't very attracted to her - as maybe she's getting use to that from those assuming this is the next Cameron?) She's very accommodating, but she's not at all my type physically, so it just wasn't all that much fun.

She really does seem to be a nice girl, and I'm sorry to have to write one of my "tell 'em as I see 'em" type reviews here. However, this is more about the BS promotional type reviews lately that really build expectations up far beyond the product offered. All the MP's do it, and we all know it drives business, but PLEASE, if you're going to promote it like it's a 7-Series BMW, at least give me a 3-Series on arrival vs. a Grand Am. Deal? Back in the day of HFH's promo's of Cameron and Little-C, it was over the top too, but the product supported the promotion? Get it?

I've probably been drawn into SRM 5 or 6 times over the last 2 years with these promotions and with the exception of Hannah (and even that promotion was over the top), they've all been let downs. Sure, different strokes for different folks, but I remember when Sophie was promoted originally as the Super-Model-High-Mileage-Queen-Extraordinair. The Super-Model marketing campaign was halted as while she's certainly a GFE, she's not a Super-Model.

kkarn/

 

[Howdy]

Thanks Kkarn.

Now I am getting 6 vs. 9 ... although I think that you are a little hard on the body rating given a look at the pics, but you did see her in person.

I am hesistant to rate someone as a 9 or above, my ratings are based similar to a normal distribution with 5 as the mean and thin tails. Therefore, a 6 would be slightly above the average and a 9 would be way above the mark.

I would like to see some more reviews. I will go and check her out soon. I noticed that they changed her double shift for today to only one and gave her a few days off for recuperation.

VBB

 

[*w0wZ* [mALiSSa]

I actually think it has a lot to do with the old adage that beauty is in the eye of the beholder and in some cases it has a lot to do with the person reading, projecting their own expectations, rather than the actual review building the expectations. Nothing profound - it's just up to the reader to be aware ... reader be aware ... buyer beware ... wooooooh

While I'd say the majority, to some degree, do buy into the "supermodel look" or a similar preconceived stereotype, many do not - one can argue against this all they want, but all you have to do is take a look around.

 

[OldPilot]

exactly

 

[Rasmah.com]

well?

 

[slsk]

So you think that i'm promoting Srm based on my personal Biases or maybe some other incentives are given to me by Joy/Micron?

You are dead wrong dude !

I do my reviews based on my encounters with any particular Mpa And I do See Them through my Eyes (LOl) Not through yours mr Kkarn.

Srm is my second favourite Spa but i don't think i have ever promoted that place.If any place i promote (Maybe unintentionally) then that place is definately Allure as it has been my personal favourite for yrs and usually i visit it on weekly basis.I do frequent Srm but for every 2 visits i make @Allure i do one @Srm.

THe said attendent is Definately a beautiful girl(AT least through my eyes).She is not Claudia or Cameroon. But does have a certain Innocence on her face which makes her very attractive.Her body is not perfect either She does have a soft stomach(Which was mentioned) Natural softer boobs Which i did like for sure ,Toned butt and toned legs. I gave her body 8/10 which in my personel rating system considered "Good", But not exceptional.I do prefer blondes so maybe that was the only bias there(Maybe an extra .5).

I'm usually a very easygoing polite guy so i very rarely get very bad sessions anywhere . Even if a session is not going as per my expectations for any reason caused by my mpa's mood or lack of interest i usually try my best to make her feel at ease and usually because i enjoy massaging good looking girls i do salvage the sessions.

I think the Milage part is totally dependent on you. So YMMV.(Depending on how you treat her ,how you look like ,how do you smell like Etc.) So please don't go with unrealistic expectations.As at the end of the day you are walking in your shoes not mine.

Cheers !

 

[MoToCroSSS -30]

Yeah, you tell them like it is "Big M" !!!

 

[As hatred sinks in]

I can defend Joy & Anita on this one too.

In the year I've been frequenting SRM, I've NEVER been asked to fudge, exaggerate or hold back my reviews...

I think the issue is everybody has their own rating system, and sometimes we can leave a session on a "high."

We come home all excited and want to share our great experience with our massageplanet.net buddies.

Perhaps there's a natural tendency to unknowingly exaggerate the ratings a little bit ?

ALSO:

We really don't know an MPA until we've had the consistency of a few sessions.

With one MPA in particular I had a GREAT first session, an average 2nd session and a downright mediocre 3rd session, so I never went back.

I wrote my review after the first and had I known what was coming obviously the review would have been different.

 

[Kara]

I'm not scrooge like when i'm doing the ratings.I usually don't like to give a girl 5/10 or less rating especially when it comes to the looks or body's dept .

Good thing is that i never got a chance to review my favourite mpa as you guys might have crucified me after seeing the 9.99/10 all the way through.(LOL).

 

[Annorax]

I think the issue is everybody has their own rating system, and sometimes we can leave a session on a "high."

We come home all excited and want to share our great experience with our massageplanet.net buddies.

Perhaps there's a natural tendency to unknowingly exaggerate the ratings a little bit ?

This is why i never write my reviews right after i see a MPA simply because I know i'll be all too giggly and excited and hype the review. That's why I wait about a week or 2 or soimetimes even 3 weeks before I write anything so I can contemplate what I do recall.

And regarding this thread about "grades" and crap i don't give out grades simply because as someone mentioned earlier, beauty is in the eye of the beholder which seems to hold true. I personally believe Haylee is a gorgeous looking girl, that's just my 2 cents. Of course I haven't seen Claudia yet but i'm not really into anything bust larger than Cs as "most likely" they are man mades which is a no-no for me.

Everyone has their own cup of tea, some like large busts, some don't, etc. hence why I don't give out grades in general and I also know some of the ladies read massageplanet.net and don't "appreciate" being graded which i can totally respect.

 

[swtchikku]

Not sure what the fucking problem is.

Haylee is pretty well the integration of the comments about her - a pretty girl, not Cameron-level but who the fuck is. Nice body - we've all seen better, but she's at the upper end of the spectrum.

Her mileage varies by location and client - but again, that's par for the course.

The core problem really is that she works so many fucking double-shifts at SRM - you try pretending that you're interested in like 15 guys a day, many of whom would probably disgust Nona.

Thankfully Haylee isn't on the runner-up list for the Nobel Prize anytime soon, so she gets thru.

Pretty girl, nice body, fun personality - just see her early in her shift.

She also (judging from the comments) doesn't seem to get yet the increasing-mileage-with-visits game that Tarah and (reportedly) Cameron had mastered; the vague promises followed by limited access, lather-rinse-repeat.

Oldest game in the book for the oldest profession in the world.