I am far from a prude,

[Asche]

but is there any need for reviews like this...



Full Review can be found at http://www.mp.netnet.com/Reviews/Review_view.php?recnum=95941

 

[bitch]

Was not too bad,
Adderz.

An idea for a new topic

we have

ROVING reviewS

what about a

ROVING reviewS ( explicit )

Simon007

 

[Due March 23 2010]

Seems to me he was treating Kenzie as an sex object rather than a human being ... no respect and very sad I hope she gets better clients than that total t*sser

 

[Pompal 09.]

Well said Sir! It did read more like he was acting out a porn film by numbers.
Ladies refer to us as gentlemen, Sad to say very few seem to act with tact and good manners to warrant that epithet.

 

[FUHummer]

TMI and a total wankerwanka:

 

[pat z]

I do not like these kind of reviews way too much information for my taste.

I am not really a fan of reviews of any kind. However I do see why they can be helpful to a gent and a great review can bring business our way. They also "out" dishonest WG.

 

[Priscilla]

ijit

 

[Karlie]

The review shows a lack of respect for the girl, it is possible to write a fairly explicit review without it being crude.

 

[?hum H]

When we first went on to AW, I would not take bookings via the system they have in place on that site, as I was in fear that some guy would write explicit a review on what we all got up to together.

This guy was way too over the top for mosts sensitivites.

Lucy.

 

[Aijaz]

I wouldn't be too quick to condem, there is a difference between mp.nets that go to "f*ck the *rse off somebody/something" and those who want some sort of GFE - many WGs cater for both - I was always under the impression that this is more of a parlour thing than indie - but that just be inexperienced twisted view of parlours - I see them as seedier than indies - mass market etc.

If I had started chatting younger I might (might!) of developed into the same kind of mp.net while I still had my youth - however body and soul want other things these days.

I guess many on here have watched (and enjoyed) porn with this sort of action and not thought that much about it, it is still real people and the audience are participating in the action effectively.

But no, certainly these days I would do anything like that unless the girl made it clear that she likes that sort of action - then I would be worried whether I could cope and whether I would want to anyway.

If the girl showed no sign of dissaproval then I see nothing wrong with the action or the review. But then, I realise the girl may not want to start a kick-off and so her hands are metaphorically tied to a degree, that does complicate the issue a tad.

Thats a lot of words to say I am sitting on the fence with this one!

 

[Jan Brady]

Too crude - not nice at all

 

[Alice In Wonderbra]

Hmmm, I've mixed feelings about it. On one hand, I hate the reviews which just state "Had a lovely time, a great girl" as that doesn't really give you an idea of what time spent with a lass might be like, but I do find the one above to be too explicit.

I also object to the C word - there are times when it's effective (one episode of Dexter uses it incredibly well to stress just how serious a situation it is and tells you a lot about the character in question) but I'd never use it in reference to a lady's 'private area'.

When I do reviews, I tend to mention the girl's appearance, her attitude, and the services provided, and whether or not I clicked with her or not, and on the odd occasion have gone in to a bit more detail - but never to an extreme like that.

 

[360J]

he is an absolute w*n*er i would be absolutely livid if i was that girl she is young admittedly but that is so crude i want to punch his lights out how dare he.

 

[kity]

Grim. Very crude and nasty.

 

[confused guy1-1]

Surely the whole point of an Review is to give as much detail as possible?

 

[The educator]

If a gent of mine wrote that about me I would decline to see him again. Gents write Review that are informative not vulgar and crude. Less is more where personal details are involved.

I certaintly would not be happy about a vile sordid review being readily available for anyone to read.

Certainly not written by a gentleman.

 

[Cladia BAbii :)]

Detail is not a problem, its thre crudeness I guess that is unnecessary.

It seemed to me like the reviewer was trying to give some bravado/wanking material to me

 

[essentiallysolo]

yes i suppose it is there to get information to the mp.net i agree but this one is totally derogative towards the woman i thought he sounded very chauvinistic to me. almost like the lady was a peice of meat!
as has been stated i would of thought it was to give you an idea of the ladys attitude . how you got along and if she followed through with the requirements of the gentleman.

 

[Abu]

Yes there are lots of word to describe things and actions, why be so near to the mark

 

[Missy H]

Which Ford GTE has a V12 engine, thats what I'd like to know!