- Joined
- Aug 8, 2009
- Messages
- 1,414
- Reaction score
- 962
- Points
- 113
Indiana Senate Bill 573 (Landske) was passed by members of the Committee on Public Policy on February 14, 2013. This is the first step in a long legislative process. If passed, the bill would amend the current state certification law to a mandatory practice act. Anyone practicing, or advertising that they practice massage therapy, would be required to obtain a license in order to practice legally in the state. Practitioners who are currently state certified would be considered รขโฌลlicensedรขโฌ automatically on July 1, 2013 if the bill is passed so they would not have to re-apply or meet new qualifications.
Under current law, state certification is required only if one รขโฌลprofesses to be a certified massage therapist,รขโฌ uses the title รขโฌลCertified Massage Therapistรขโฌ or รขโฌลMassage Therapist,รขโฌ or uses the abbreviation รขโฌลCMTรขโฌ or รขโฌลMTรขโฌ to imply that he or she is a certified massage therapist. The proposed bill would eliminate the รขโฌลcertificationรขโฌ process and replace it by requiring a mandatory license for anyone who practices massage therapy, no matter what title the practitioner is using. A person practicing massage therapy without a license would be guilty of a Class B misdemeanor.
If passed, SB 573 would expand the authority of the State Board of Massage Therapy by authorizing it to establish standards for the competent practice of massage therapy, approve massage therapy school curricula consistent with accepted national standards, and establish continuing education requirements. In addition, the Board would have the ability to establish an inactive license category.
SB 573 would also pre-empt the local regulation of massage therapists so that practitioners would not have to obtain multiple individual city permits/licenses to practice; however, the municipalities would maintain their authority over zoning and business licenses.
ABMP is generally supportive of SB 573. If passed, the regulation of massage therapists in Indiana would become more consistent with the rest of the country. We will keep Indiana members apprised of the status of the bill.
Under current law, state certification is required only if one รขโฌลprofesses to be a certified massage therapist,รขโฌ uses the title รขโฌลCertified Massage Therapistรขโฌ or รขโฌลMassage Therapist,รขโฌ or uses the abbreviation รขโฌลCMTรขโฌ or รขโฌลMTรขโฌ to imply that he or she is a certified massage therapist. The proposed bill would eliminate the รขโฌลcertificationรขโฌ process and replace it by requiring a mandatory license for anyone who practices massage therapy, no matter what title the practitioner is using. A person practicing massage therapy without a license would be guilty of a Class B misdemeanor.
If passed, SB 573 would expand the authority of the State Board of Massage Therapy by authorizing it to establish standards for the competent practice of massage therapy, approve massage therapy school curricula consistent with accepted national standards, and establish continuing education requirements. In addition, the Board would have the ability to establish an inactive license category.
SB 573 would also pre-empt the local regulation of massage therapists so that practitioners would not have to obtain multiple individual city permits/licenses to practice; however, the municipalities would maintain their authority over zoning and business licenses.
ABMP is generally supportive of SB 573. If passed, the regulation of massage therapists in Indiana would become more consistent with the rest of the country. We will keep Indiana members apprised of the status of the bill.