Pompal 09.
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2011
- Messages
- 43,916
- Reaction score
- 52
- Points
- 48
It's Friday night, and all my entertainment and MP budget for this week is gone. Thought I'd keep myself entertained by creating another useless thread.
Everyone has their own system of rating MPA's, some are a bit lenient in their ratings, while other's are just brutal. Also everyone has different tastes, so one person's cup of tea may not suit the other, which is often reflected in their reviews.
The following is my "sacred text" when writing reviews on massageplanet.net. Any thoughts or opinions on this system ... you like it or it just sucks ? What's your system of rating MPA's ? You can give examples as to which MPA falls in what category. Or we can set benchmarks (if we can agree upon it) to judge all the other MPA's by.
10.0: "Perfect"
Virtually flawless ... It doesn't get any better than this. This is like winning the lottery on your birthday. It takes a rare and special MPA to earn a perfect 10.
9.0 - 9.9: "Superb"
An MPA with only minor flaws or imperfections. If an MPA scores a 9.0 or higher, you know she's great with just enough imperfections to let you know they're for real. These MPA's are the best of the best.
8.0 - 8.9: "Great"
MPA's in this range are excellent in almost everyway. Their few setbacks probably aren't too important. Highly recommended.
7.0 - 7.9: "Good"
A good MPA who has some obvious flaws. MPA's in this range might have some first-rate attributes, but a few shortcomings as well.
6.0 - 6.9: "Fair"
Passable, but just barely. An MPA within this range has certain good qualities but significant problems as well. MPA's in the 6 range may well be worth seeing, but you should approach them with caution.
5.0 - 5.9: "Mediocre"
As the title says, just average. The MPA has more weaknesses than she should, that in the end, offsets a strengths she may have.
4.0 - 4.9: "Poor"
Not worth your attention, and if you happen to end up with one, you should ask for a refund.
3.0 - 3.9: "Bad"
This MPA has some major suckage issues ... shouldn't get too close to any MPA in this range.
2.0 - 2.9: "Terrible"
Hobbyists beware ... Go at your own risk !!!
1.0 - 1.9: "Miserable"
Run like hell !!! Anyone in this category completetly lacks the attributes to be an MPA.
0.0 - 0.9: "Beyond Miserable"
The absolute worst of the worst.
Everyone has their own system of rating MPA's, some are a bit lenient in their ratings, while other's are just brutal. Also everyone has different tastes, so one person's cup of tea may not suit the other, which is often reflected in their reviews.
The following is my "sacred text" when writing reviews on massageplanet.net. Any thoughts or opinions on this system ... you like it or it just sucks ? What's your system of rating MPA's ? You can give examples as to which MPA falls in what category. Or we can set benchmarks (if we can agree upon it) to judge all the other MPA's by.
10.0: "Perfect"
Virtually flawless ... It doesn't get any better than this. This is like winning the lottery on your birthday. It takes a rare and special MPA to earn a perfect 10.
9.0 - 9.9: "Superb"
An MPA with only minor flaws or imperfections. If an MPA scores a 9.0 or higher, you know she's great with just enough imperfections to let you know they're for real. These MPA's are the best of the best.
8.0 - 8.9: "Great"
MPA's in this range are excellent in almost everyway. Their few setbacks probably aren't too important. Highly recommended.
7.0 - 7.9: "Good"
A good MPA who has some obvious flaws. MPA's in this range might have some first-rate attributes, but a few shortcomings as well.
6.0 - 6.9: "Fair"
Passable, but just barely. An MPA within this range has certain good qualities but significant problems as well. MPA's in the 6 range may well be worth seeing, but you should approach them with caution.
5.0 - 5.9: "Mediocre"
As the title says, just average. The MPA has more weaknesses than she should, that in the end, offsets a strengths she may have.
4.0 - 4.9: "Poor"
Not worth your attention, and if you happen to end up with one, you should ask for a refund.
3.0 - 3.9: "Bad"
This MPA has some major suckage issues ... shouldn't get too close to any MPA in this range.
2.0 - 2.9: "Terrible"
Hobbyists beware ... Go at your own risk !!!
1.0 - 1.9: "Miserable"
Run like hell !!! Anyone in this category completetly lacks the attributes to be an MPA.
0.0 - 0.9: "Beyond Miserable"
The absolute worst of the worst.