Angelina
I saw Angelina a few months ago and she is apparently back on schedule.
I took an hour and the top option - $80 RF, $80 top tip ( this was before the price increase )I'd been told in advance by the "secretary" that Angelina is very pretty. Upon her entrance, I was not disappointed, but found her kind of lanky. I later figured out it was the high shoes lending to this perception. She is very slim, with nice, possibly, B+ / C- cups. There is some body art going on, which may be a deterrent for some, but it was tasteful and interesting to me. No doubt she is a pretty girl. Very talkative and friendly; she does have a tinge of that youthful self consumed arrogance. It's by no means obnoxious although makes it hard to establish a comfortable connection.
The actual session was fairly canned and somewhat lacked creativity. She applied oil, which is something I've grown to dislike somewhat, due to the taste and fluid barrier it creates between skin senses. She was relatively liberal, but the essential requirements where amiss. However, time flew and for the finale she took it upon herself to turn around (no sitting) as she painted a veritable voluptuous vista, but positioning the picture just out of reach for any real oral appreciation.
Angelina is up there among the top MPA's, in looks, although lacks the refinement and oozing sexuality type look of MPA's like say, Cameron for instance. For lack of a better comparison, I'd say she is a "prettier" Cameron Diaz meets Darryl Hannah in overall effect. Taking all into consideration, it was a good experience.
Fun factor : 6
Mya (now Cyan of Steeles Royal )
I took a half hour and the top option - $50 RF, $80 top tip.My initial impression was that she is tall and thin. She's an attractive girl, but not the look I expected, having read on the website she is East Indian. She's apparently part Persian, having relatively light skin as opposed to what we might stereotype in East Indian women. She has streaked blond hair which was done up in some type of concoction. Apparently she is 22. I gotta say she looked pretty hot in that tight dress. I generally don't focus on bodies as being a big part of the hotness factor, but Mya's body is my kinda body (if I ever get a sex change). She's slimmer than her pictures reveal with a small waist curving out to a nice rounded tight ass and all topped off with two firm perky B+ or C- cups. I think she also had very high shoes on.
A most excellent light feather touch massage which included some teasing. I found the ensuing session to be too canned and restrictive for my liking. I got a real sense of deja vu to that of my previous session with Angelina. Eye contact was seemingly avoided throughout. Apparently she will do a strip tease if requested and make use of the couch ( more like a big chair ). The finish was very much like that of Angelina although further out of reach.
Essentially she is an attractive girl, although not hot as such. Her hotness factor could increase in direct proportion to added sensuality. She no doubt has a great body and would satisfy anyone who just wants to get an MP experience "contact" type session and little more. Although relatively personable, we didn't clickity click. I don't mean "socially" as such, but the comfort level was just not there. I know I'm not the most personable person myself and tend to be relatively laid back. So, it very well could be YMMV on that deal. Overall it was a good experience, just not great.
Fun factor : 5I noticed Kkarn is using the 'fun factor' rating method. It's a good way to relate the experience, but you'd have to take into account the reviewers personal acronym essentials. For the record mine being DFK/ DATY, of which one or both must be present or seem possible, without exception, for me to repeat. Intensity and other variables may also enter into this factor, as I perceive it. Lack of these in a specific session would generally be a 7.
I saw Angelina a few months ago and she is apparently back on schedule.
I took an hour and the top option - $80 RF, $80 top tip ( this was before the price increase )I'd been told in advance by the "secretary" that Angelina is very pretty. Upon her entrance, I was not disappointed, but found her kind of lanky. I later figured out it was the high shoes lending to this perception. She is very slim, with nice, possibly, B+ / C- cups. There is some body art going on, which may be a deterrent for some, but it was tasteful and interesting to me. No doubt she is a pretty girl. Very talkative and friendly; she does have a tinge of that youthful self consumed arrogance. It's by no means obnoxious although makes it hard to establish a comfortable connection.
The actual session was fairly canned and somewhat lacked creativity. She applied oil, which is something I've grown to dislike somewhat, due to the taste and fluid barrier it creates between skin senses. She was relatively liberal, but the essential requirements where amiss. However, time flew and for the finale she took it upon herself to turn around (no sitting) as she painted a veritable voluptuous vista, but positioning the picture just out of reach for any real oral appreciation.
Angelina is up there among the top MPA's, in looks, although lacks the refinement and oozing sexuality type look of MPA's like say, Cameron for instance. For lack of a better comparison, I'd say she is a "prettier" Cameron Diaz meets Darryl Hannah in overall effect. Taking all into consideration, it was a good experience.
Fun factor : 6
Mya (now Cyan of Steeles Royal )
I took a half hour and the top option - $50 RF, $80 top tip.My initial impression was that she is tall and thin. She's an attractive girl, but not the look I expected, having read on the website she is East Indian. She's apparently part Persian, having relatively light skin as opposed to what we might stereotype in East Indian women. She has streaked blond hair which was done up in some type of concoction. Apparently she is 22. I gotta say she looked pretty hot in that tight dress. I generally don't focus on bodies as being a big part of the hotness factor, but Mya's body is my kinda body (if I ever get a sex change). She's slimmer than her pictures reveal with a small waist curving out to a nice rounded tight ass and all topped off with two firm perky B+ or C- cups. I think she also had very high shoes on.
A most excellent light feather touch massage which included some teasing. I found the ensuing session to be too canned and restrictive for my liking. I got a real sense of deja vu to that of my previous session with Angelina. Eye contact was seemingly avoided throughout. Apparently she will do a strip tease if requested and make use of the couch ( more like a big chair ). The finish was very much like that of Angelina although further out of reach.
Essentially she is an attractive girl, although not hot as such. Her hotness factor could increase in direct proportion to added sensuality. She no doubt has a great body and would satisfy anyone who just wants to get an MP experience "contact" type session and little more. Although relatively personable, we didn't clickity click. I don't mean "socially" as such, but the comfort level was just not there. I know I'm not the most personable person myself and tend to be relatively laid back. So, it very well could be YMMV on that deal. Overall it was a good experience, just not great.
Fun factor : 5I noticed Kkarn is using the 'fun factor' rating method. It's a good way to relate the experience, but you'd have to take into account the reviewers personal acronym essentials. For the record mine being DFK/ DATY, of which one or both must be present or seem possible, without exception, for me to repeat. Intensity and other variables may also enter into this factor, as I perceive it. Lack of these in a specific session would generally be a 7.