Not A Review

[ren e]

How do you do a review for a Spa that won't allow it?

For instance, if a girl was really exceptional.

How could the moderators dare to censor me?



Just maybe the girl deserves some press.

Even if her name isn't Cameron or Paige.

Now perhaps if I didn't reveal any dirty details.

No nasty stories.

If I simply said she was sweet and nice.

Fantastic looking.

Energetic and fun.

Rightfully they would have to leave my post alone?

 

[Peter B]

NOT a problem - b/c you have not said anything about anybody;

good to hear that it was NOT a negative experience;

may be what you went through was NOT a massage.

 

[PandaNinja]

No, not negative at all and even this newbie recognized the experience as a massage. A damn fine one at that.

Newbie on the board but i have been around a bit.

 

[Pompal 09.]

Where was it not located?

 

[StuJag]

I thought that we could post non explicit reviews naming the MP & Mpa. Am I wrong? In another current thread posted by becks "need advice on who to see" I posted a reply that was really a review - within my understanding of the guidelines.

Maybe Fred or one of the Moderators could check the content. Let us know if it's OK. Has anyone tried a similar non explicit HFH or IT review?

V12

 

[flames]

Oh, for crying out loud. That was obviously a bad attempt.

H

F

H



J

E

N

N

I

F

E

R


She is an absolute doll. Amazing, in fact. Part of me doesn't want to spread the word, the other side of my brain thought I should give her a mention because she deserves all the business she can get. Just a great ( I refuse to use "sweet") lady.

My bad attempt at an acroptic message was partly poking fun at the "ban" and partly trying to avoid being censored on only my 7th post.

Perhaps I shouldn't have attempted that after a couple of beer.

 

[alizemuffin]

HFH has specifically requested that NO REVIEWS, good or bad, explicit or non-explicit, silly or serious be posted. They simply don't want to be reviewed, IN ANY WAY, because it puts them in danger with the by-law officers of the Town. Each town is different and therefore different rules apply. The owner of HFH has requested this public ally. I may not entirely agree with it, but it isn't my business or livelihood that is at stake. But I still respect their decision.

Carry on.....

 

[Above Normal]

Now that we know who it was, you should take comfort in knowing that she had been well reviewed in the past. You meant well, but on balance, as Cardinal has pointed out, honoring the owner's wish should probably take higher priority.

 

[Turkini]

Actually that has only been requested of massageplanet.net. Kayla has non explicit reviews of HFH MPA's on her own site MBB. I would assume that similar reviews would be OK on massageplanet.net. Does she want to be the exclusive source of info on HFH? I hope not.

V12

 

[baby face]

Thanks for the info V12! But when I went to MBB I noticed this posted from Kayla (sticky in Massage Forum):

[/b]

It does seem that reviews of any kind are not requested.

 

[Riki]

Thanks Cardinal, the reviews were still there 2 days ago. At least she Finally decided to be consistent. I feel a bit better about her now.

(Edit add on) Oops - gotta take that back!!! The reviews of HFH MPA's are still on MBB. The sticky is dated Apr 8/03 so there has been lots of time to delete. There is a June 6/03 review of Tarah on the site - "Tara a gift from God". WTF.

V12

 

[Arti Gupta]

Just to keep things clear, if that is at all possible, that quote was posted on MBB on April 8th 2003.

I think, that since that time it was decided that reviews in the 'MBB database' are "safer" as they can be more specifically and constantly monitored

( edit add on ) Oh, I see you figured it out, V12 ... hehe ... let the speculation continue ...

___________
The only completely consistent people are the dead. - Aldous Huxley

 

[PLAYBOY]

Thanks Pool....

V12, I stand corrected. I don't have to like it! But it appears that you are correct.

 

[Gaila]

Lets find out what massageplanet.net's policy is. I will post a non explicit Review.

V12

 

[Trust Me]

The quote by Cardinal is "old". Many reviews on HFH had been posted. Some positive ones still remain (I did a search on Cameron to find out many positive reviews of her after Kayla's request as quoted are still there). On the other hand, most negative reviews had been quickly removed, until this recent Miss T saga.

Inconsistency in what to keep and what to delete is obvious, the motive behind is unclear. I once pointed out a HFH review (a positive one on Cameron) to one of the admin person and the response was "couldn't keep up in deleting all of them". Obviously that post is still on this board.

 

[24 Char Left]

Dudes this isn't rocket science!

We don't want anything on the board that by-law or LE could use against our spas and MPAs. So that means no posting about anything that violates a by-law or the criminal code. If you want details stick to PMs to known massageplanet.netites.

So what can you post? Attitude, service (not mileage), looks, body, but don't talk about anything offside. What details are offside? Anything beyond the fact that you got a massage. Even a nude massage is a bylaw infraction, a release is an indecent act under the criminal code, so we can't talk about these things!

Example of legit review:

"I just saw Godzilla. She was totally awesome. Wicked body. Gorgeous face. Knows how to apply great technique. Every part of the experience was up to HFH standards. Her skin was a little dry though! I recommend her!"

Now, here we have review that can't be used against the MPA or the spa, but it does tell us that she rocks. If you need details and the poster knows you're legit, then you can PM him.

-Dudenhagen

 

[MrSelfDestruct]

Dudenhagen - exactly. Anyone creating trouble for the MP's by being too explicit should be banished. We can still give a good or bad review.

V12

 

[Pompal 09.]

I thought this thread was about Kayla's request for not to post ANY review about HFH on massageplanet.net. Did you have trouble following it or it was a diversion tactic?

 

[sarahsardine]

All the reviews aren't being deleted, look around.

My guess is that Kayla made that request b/c too many posters couldn't discern between a safe review and a harmful one, so better safe than sorry. We almost can't blame her. Too many by-law violations and HFH gets suspended. Then we all lose.

 

[Pompal 09.]

You call that clear?