Review - Brittney @ Plats

[liquidsilicon]

ok agreed....but if you're paying her $600, then what's the challenge there really? Anyone can go out with a sex trade worker if they're willing to give her that much.
I'm presuming that you're loaded so I won't judge you...but if you're just a regular guy with a regular job, then giving a chick that much to hang out with you (plus paying all "date" expenses) is simply stupid....

 

[You can call me Rob]

to each there own. She is a cool chic, would i toss 600 bones to hang out with her no. Free sure who wouldn't. But then agian, to each their own, and what we do with our cash is our business. I wouldn't call it stupid what the above dude did, he paid and enjoyed his time. Which is what this hobby is about. But its not something i would choose to do either (not yet anyway, some day, who knows).

Cheers.

 

[eee]

I didn't read anyone suggest that spending $600+ on a
(sexless) date with a MPA is stupid. That it is
something to brag about is amusing if not stupid.

 

[Pompal 09.]

Paid or unpaid or costs only, stupid or not, whether I have done it or not... all irrelevant IMO,

My concern is why is someone outing a specific MPA for a private service. That should not be disucces by specific name on this board. Lack of respect to me.


Keep it to pm's if you need to boast about it.

 

[Badboy Scotty]

from the post above mine.

cheers.

 

[Steph]

My bad that I overlooked 'stupid' in the
statement you quoted. I do notice that statement
was a response to the post's boasting of getting a
"date" from a popular MPA.

I agree with the other post that disclosure of such
private service from a MPA is disrespectful.
Besides, it shows that the close tie to the MPA
boasted about was likely a rather shallow one.

 

[Clark]

this may be a fantasy that this fellow decided to post to make it seem more real