Review: Felicity @ Star Studio.

[johnb693]

How do you write a negative review of someone so sweet and tried so hard to please you? Felicity is a wonderful sweet girl. I saw a couple of reviews and decided that she would be next. However I guess I should have done some more investigating. She is very pretty but her body is bigger then I expected and totally turned me off. She tried her best to make the session fun, but I was turned off and just couldn't get into it. I guess I'm learning everyday how it works around here.

1 - Do you're homework

2 - Some massageplanet.net guys are chubby chasers.

 

[HRmassage]

Felicity is a cool gal and true shes not as skinny as Shanti but she's not as big as Rosemary more like a big bone gal not chubby with a noticable gut....and dam Beckham you are good looking

 

[Dens112]

I've found most massageplanet.net reviewers remarkably accurate and constistent except when it comes to weight, height, cup size and overall attractiveness.

 

[knowledge_dispenser]

I agree with you - think you would like her sis Natasha better.

 

[ariel]

Is this really necessary? What if Felicty reads the boards and came across your comment? I'm sure she felt a little put off by your hairy ass and rotund 55 year old body.

 

[Mike A]

Well it is a review board, physical attributes are germane to the subject, and this review was very restrained and considerate I thought. Didn't you improve the atmosphere by pointing out an insult you chose to see, where others might have seen a guide. Anyone in a profession where reviews are the norm had better get used to hearing unwelcome descriptions or change professions.

There are boards where MP's and SP's review johns, and I'm sure no one would object if Felicity posted a rebuttal right here. Meantime you should likely keep your personal knowledge and unwanted opinions of other massageplanet.netarian's bodies to yourself, especially considering your complaint. Try to live by your own words.

 

[adia]

Nice review and it is okay to be honest.



This is what I have found, no matter how much homework you do there is always a chance of having a session that is not in line with your readings.

Also there is a matter of doing thorough research. I reviewed her in early July and gave a description which looks to be similar to what you experienced. Remember time can have an affect on an MPAs weight, it is easy to gain/lose 10 lbs in a month, so recent reviews are the best. NOT, for example I reviewed Rosemary @ Bchain on the same day as another member, the opinions were bi-polar.

I go in with no expectation even after reading a recent review and if the MPA is not physically appealing I still try to make the best of it. I am there to have a good time and she is there to provide one, within limits of course.



Sure, and you can count me as one of them. I love women of all shapes and sizes. I find that many of the "chubby" ones know how to treat a man much better than the skinny eye candy. To each his own.

VBB

 

[Lone Wolf]

So in your opinion we should write the reviews for the MPA's?

 

[the mysterious stranger]

do you mean "write" ?

 

[Pixistiks]

Yes and corrected.

So would you prefer I sugar coat my review?

 

[natesando]

No,your review is a good review just the way it is.It is honest and balanced as you pointed out the positive and the negative and did not just slam her.There is nothing wrong with stating you were not attracted to her looks as they were not what you thought they would be.

I read the other reviews of her and I could see why you were interested in her as some of the other reviews were not as specific about her looks,although VBB did mention she had some extra padding,and I could understand your disappointment about her appearance.

I think most of us make our choices largely based on what we are physically attracted to and I for one appreciate your candor.


p.s. you are one handsome sonofabitch!