Should members with no posts be banned?

[crayzblonde]

Should massageplanet.net start banning members whose membership is more than one year old & who have NO POSTS?

Why be a member if you don't share with the rest of us.

Just a thought....

 

[katie.]

... it seems like many people on this site actually think that post count equals some sort of ''all knowing'' attitude about everything, and post count equals intelligence. You and I both have seen this on this board many times.

''Oh, and you state this after 157 posts ''. Comments like this are a joke and you should obviously agree with me here.

Other people even take on the ideas of people with high post counts as if you or the owner or whoever have a monoploy on understanding what a good blowjob is, or who will win the Stanely cup, or if a cop uses excessive force or who will win the election .

This is my actual point.


But if you are really asking me what I think you should do ......... Well, I do not think mods or owners should post at all. Keeps things more professional.

 

[A Wolf at the Door.]

I think this is a silly idea. I didn't start posting for at least half a year. Some might be afraid of getting caught or something.

 

[Mags]

I think that the post counts should not include "Word Count" and "Idle Ramblings" threads where some members (cough, cough, S'beau, cough, cough) have accumulated 90% of their total.

btw, we'll miss you Hank.

 

[MtBikr]

I'm refusing to wear a helmet over my posts...

 

[~*~AsHiEs~*~AuNt~*~]

Sometimes us low posting members are gun shy. As I've seen on the board before, that if a member posts a review and has a low count he gets bashed. Or if his openion doesn't match the masses then he gets blasted. It does seem like an old boys club around here from the outside. Although I don't post much, I do pm with help when ever I can. Plus I find the reading very interesting at times. Alot of different people make up this board some with alot to say and others like me with very little. If you feel the need to ban members like me then so be it. But I've enjoyed and learned alot from here on many different subjects.

Regards

 

[snvffy]

Thats why I suggested one year.

 

[Henock]

Does this constitute a post?

 

[FreeZe]

You wouldn't think that way if you had more posts...

 

[airmonkey120]

I guess it does.

What bothers me is that out of the blue someone just PM's you looking for info of XYZ. I always do a search of the sender. I look at how long they have been a member and how many posts. When it says NO POST and member for 2 years, why would I bother providing info.

 

[servingseniorcitizens]

Why do you have a bug up your a$$ about post counts? It is what the person say and not how often they say it. I look for content in what people say, so it doesn't really matter if the poster has 10 or 20k posts.

The members with high post counts just like to comment on the forum. If some didn't post a lot it would be a pretty dead place.

To the OP. Why don't you let the moderators/owner decide what is acceptable on the board and leave it to them to decide?

 

[yardwork]

I could really care less about post count. Some guys on here who have over 1000 are just as useless as guys with zero.

If you're a lurker then lurk. I just hate guys who have been on here for years and want you to answer their questions (detailed questions) about ladies and contribute nothing.


So if I haven't replied to your PM, now you know why. At least give me something first.

 

[Jm e]

I think that the mods should ban anyone with over 2000 posts because it seems to me that around the 2000 number is when people here start assuming that they have all the answers and that high post counts equals truths.

Seems to me that this place would be nicer if anyone over 2000 posts gets banned.

I think that the people with less post numbers seem to not have that false sense of reality.

For me , guys with 5000+ posts seem quite irrational.

 

[Mr McGoo]

some don't share because they get attacked for various reasons & some like their privacy

then there are some who don't stop posting

never judge a man by the amount of his post

 

[x3xiaoqi]

Exactly my point.

 

[azn m0n]

Once upon a time there was a postper period of time limit... 2003ish

didn't stick to well

 

[snipe4lyf]

You might also forget about a group of people who quite possibly take up a large amount of the 0 post count. Out of towners. Not being local we (yes I am one of them) don't know the ladies of the area and truly appreciate forums such as these to gather information. Considering they may not visit the site after their evening with their lady as they are no longer in the area they may not think of posting a review or perhaps the lady even requested no review. Either way, it's possibly another year before we are in the area again....

Some of those could easily be disabled (I would not ban any IP though), and for myself if they did I'd just create another when another trip to toronto was in the works. (Although I'm glad I dont have to go through that)

My 2 cents. (and possibly 1st post. cant recall)

 

[mukeshgupta]

my post is always straight & true....

But seriously it seems to defeat the purpose of a DISSCUSSION board if all you do is take our advice and return nothing in exchange.

 

[C C]

I lurk. At any rate, I've read several threads of a similar or analagous nature, periodically, in the last few years. People have raised many good reasons on why there are those who don't post. There are two things that I would mention on top of them. Many people who submit to the wisdom of the board end up only seeing well reviewed ladies and find that to post another in a long line of good reviews is simply redundant. Also, and I've never seen this mentioned yet, there is the fact that people have distinctive styles of writing. While the board provides anonymity, ultimately a person writes the way they write. Not to mention handles, but there are two people on this board that I have 'discovered,' whom I know from my everyday life because I recognized their distinctive patterns of writing. I personally would rather not be 'discovered' in the same manner, for reasons all my own. That doesn't mean, though, that I am not appreciative of all those who do post. And besides, I never PM others to ask for information. If I can't find it with the search functions, it's not there for me to know.

 

[518]

.....I do not care about post counts at all.
The wingnut who opened this thread asked a ridiculous question which I commented on a little tongue in cheek.

Many people here ( and you included btw) seem to think that a higher post count equals some sort of intelligence. This is very evident in your attitude and i see it in the mod who commented earlier, whoever he is .